This song will be more realizable when we will not with our CR.
CR we will miss u.
RUKTI HAWA SAA THA WOH, AALASI PATANG SAA THA WOH
KHAANE GAYA USE DHUDON-2
HAMKO TO CLASSES THI CHALATI
WO KHUD HI TIME TABLE BANATA
TONI SE MILTA MASTI ME CHALTA THA WOH
HAMKO MIDSEM KI FIKAR SATATI, WOH 'SRG' KE QUIZZES BHI PADTA
HAR TRAIN ME KHUL KE SOTA THA WOH
BADLAPUR SE AAYA THA WOH, CHHUKE HAMARE DIL KO
KHAANE GAYA USE DHUDON
GAMAKTI DEO KI PAHACHAN KE JAISA
RANE KE MEHMAAN KE JAISA
H9 KE TAWANG ME RAHTA THA WOH
HAM SAHME SE KHATE MESS ME
WOH SIRKHAND ME GONTE LAGATA
CHICKEN ME BHI DAHI MILAKE PAPAD PAR SOTA THA WOH
PRITI KA PYARA THA WOH, 'CR' HAMARA THA WOH
KHAANE GAYA USE DHUDON
HAMKO TO CLASSES..........
HAM TO APNI COURSE THE CHUNTE, USKO KHUD HI GARGE CHUNTA
KULKARNI KO BACKUP ME RAKHKAR, CHATUR KO PADTA THA WOH
PAPPU SE LADTA THA WOH, MNS PAR MARTA THA WOH
KHAANE GAYA USE DHUDON..............
HAMKO TO CLASSES..........
Monday, March 1, 2010
Monday, November 9, 2009
One young man went for an IAS Interview.
One young man went for an IAS Interview.
“When did India get independence?” He was asked.”The efforts began a few years earlier and final result was in 1947″ He replied.”Who was responsible for our independence?”.”There were so many. Whom to mention?.If I name one it will be a injustice to another.”He replied.”Is corruption the number one enemy in our country?”.”Some research is going on the subject and I can answer with certainly only after seeing the report” He replied.
The interview board was very pleased with his original and thoughtful answers and asked him not to reveal the questions to others,since they were planning to ask the same questions. When he went out naturally others were curious to know what was asked. He politely declined, but one persistent Sardar would not leave him.
“At least tell me the answers” he pleaded, and our friend obliged. Then it was the turn of this Sardar. When he went inside, since his resume was slightly illegible, the board member asked him.”By the way, what is your date of birth?” He replied, “The effort began a few years earlier
and final result was in 1947.” Somewhat puzzled, they asked another clarification.”What is your fathers name?” He replied, “There were so many. Whom to mention”. If I name one it will be injustice to another” The interviewer was incensed. “Hey! are you mad or what?” He replied.
“Some research is going on the subject. I can answer with certainty only after seeing the report.”
Saturday, October 31, 2009
Reform in Judiciary is inevitable
The way the judiciary is functioning not seems transparent. In the matter of appointment of a judge and handling of complaints of corruption and other misconduct needs a urgent reform to make judiciary more visible and effective.
In our IPC there is no effective law to deal with judicial corruption. Judges (inquiry) act 1968 in not strict enough to deal with such charges and calls for an amendment.
It is also worth to notice that fixing a judicial commission or appointing a independent judicial official might not serve the purpose.
The need of the hour is to set a body which is independent of both judiciary and government. This body will supposed to be lodge genuine charges of corruption and misconduct against judges and carry out inquiries against theses allegation.
The existing rule is that no enquiry can be carried out against a office holding judge of high court or supreme court without a written permission from CJI.
We have evidence from the past when judicial body could not shunned itself form public dissatisfaction over its conduct. Justice Y.K. Sabharwal case tarnished the image of judiciary. He was alleged to have taken a biased decision on sealing commercial properties which mainly benefited his son.
And recent running Karnataka Chief justice Dinkaran case makes my point even stronger. In a recent meeting held in Delhi, Supreme Court advocate Mr. Prasant Bhusanhas has raised question on elevation of Justice Dinkaran to Supreme Court judge, recommended by Supreme Court collegium.
We do not have any system of rules that are supposed to be followed by the Supreme Court collegium in the matter of elevation of a judge. First judiciary should frame out a criteria of elevation which is expected to show transparency in the method of choosing judges.
It will be in the best interest of judiciary if they do not involve them self in selecting a judge. This will save their time and ensure fast finalization of pending cases. This job should be entrusted to a independent, professional body to select judges. This will ensure transparency in all stage of selection.
Thursday, October 22, 2009
removing the board exam for 10
The decision of HRD Minister Kapil Sibbal to scrap or make the class ten exams optional did not sound good to me. I can easily remember my own board exam for 10. It was exiting more than challenging. At that time I had a dream to do better in that exam so that my own school could recognize my ability. Definitely many more students like me would have possessed same dream. But what now when board exam will be scrapped? The decision came in public domain when government came to know many suicide cases committed by student and leaving suicide notes which read that they were unable to borne the pressure of exam and had fear of not fulfilling the demand of parents. Citing that reason many of us favouring the government decision but sceptical lobby who opposed this decision are also there.
Why class 10 board exam grab attention of all irrespective of reach and poor, rural or urban? Simple reason is that, this is the first time when most of the student gets an opportunity to gauge their level of understanding against one another. We have a country of billion plus population where not a single field is easily achievable. If we want to move forward and pleased to make the difference then we must juggle against the crowd. If we see the decision in this respect then we realize that we are doing no good by scrapping the board exam but postponing the reality which we must have to face in future. Just after two year of board 10 exam we have to appear for class twelve examinations and other competitive examinations. Will the stress be lesser than exiting board 10 exams? Not at all even much more than what it was in class 10.If we apply the same suicide logic then we will come to conclusion that we must scrap the class 12 exam as well. Some of U can argue that maturity also matters in these suicide criteria. But I do not favour u because a mature person has more chance to commit suicide as against to a naive one.
Proper Solution--- So what should be the right approach at this point? What is the wrong with the class ten examinations? Should we change the exam or our attitude? Why we are seeking to ease the board 10 exams, not the competitive exams? One important point is that pressure on the students is due to the undue importance given to this exam. Not every student write JEE or IAS exam but not a single student can escaped from board 10 exams. Why parents expect more percentage in board exams from their children? People aspire for a good school and better percentage to realize their dream of entering in a good college. And after entering in a good college we aspire for a good job. It is the career which motivates us and our parents. Should we stop students from excelling in their career? No, this is not a solution. Despite of this we must provide career councilor to guide student in and after class 10. The work of the councilor will be to meet the parents of those students who are not doing well or have an abnormal attitude about the exams .Councilor have to guide the parents that do not enforce to their children about academic excellence. And change the attitude of expectation. Second important point is that Science subject looks more lucrative and offer more opportunity than arts one (most of us think like that but in reality it is not true). So this makes an extra reason to score well in class ten exams to get the science subject (This is the criteria in most of Indian school). Scrapping the exams makes even more complicate …………..will be continued this post Suggestion welcome.....
Why class 10 board exam grab attention of all irrespective of reach and poor, rural or urban? Simple reason is that, this is the first time when most of the student gets an opportunity to gauge their level of understanding against one another. We have a country of billion plus population where not a single field is easily achievable. If we want to move forward and pleased to make the difference then we must juggle against the crowd. If we see the decision in this respect then we realize that we are doing no good by scrapping the board exam but postponing the reality which we must have to face in future. Just after two year of board 10 exam we have to appear for class twelve examinations and other competitive examinations. Will the stress be lesser than exiting board 10 exams? Not at all even much more than what it was in class 10.If we apply the same suicide logic then we will come to conclusion that we must scrap the class 12 exam as well. Some of U can argue that maturity also matters in these suicide criteria. But I do not favour u because a mature person has more chance to commit suicide as against to a naive one.
Proper Solution--- So what should be the right approach at this point? What is the wrong with the class ten examinations? Should we change the exam or our attitude? Why we are seeking to ease the board 10 exams, not the competitive exams? One important point is that pressure on the students is due to the undue importance given to this exam. Not every student write JEE or IAS exam but not a single student can escaped from board 10 exams. Why parents expect more percentage in board exams from their children? People aspire for a good school and better percentage to realize their dream of entering in a good college. And after entering in a good college we aspire for a good job. It is the career which motivates us and our parents. Should we stop students from excelling in their career? No, this is not a solution. Despite of this we must provide career councilor to guide student in and after class 10. The work of the councilor will be to meet the parents of those students who are not doing well or have an abnormal attitude about the exams .Councilor have to guide the parents that do not enforce to their children about academic excellence. And change the attitude of expectation. Second important point is that Science subject looks more lucrative and offer more opportunity than arts one (most of us think like that but in reality it is not true). So this makes an extra reason to score well in class ten exams to get the science subject (This is the criteria in most of Indian school). Scrapping the exams makes even more complicate …………..will be continued this post Suggestion welcome.....
Sunday, October 11, 2009
Saturday, October 3, 2009
Today's headlines of some daily news paper
Previously I had send this to all my classmate via sankhya mail and I did not have any idea to post it on blog but when Amar suggested me to do it then it strike my mind ya this is not a bad idea. Let this to be read everyone whoever come across my blog.
Today's headline of some daily newspaper-------
Amar Times---Karnala conquered!!Today's headline of some daily newspaper-------
Abhishek Age--Aunty and Ojas brought me defeat!!
Bunk Dawn---- Next trip to Everest!!
Riddhi chronicle-- Accepted notion that girls exhibit a herd mentality is misplaced!!
U.P Keshari-- "R" and "A" knocked the Supreme Court door!!
Gappu Herald—Gappu ushered in a new era of involvement, enjoyed the overall trip. Go Gappu!!
The Arun-----Sometimes you should have fear!!
Uma Express--I m the Cop, I m the Cop!!
Majhi Jagran--Fever was not the fear!!
Pappu Ujala--Age is not a bar!!
Arundhati Journal--Gappu topped the Mafia game!!
Ashish Sahara---Math treasury dep. showed a sign of improvement.
Pande Sandesh---- God was very near from that height!!
Ojas Pioneer------Paracetamol and bandage was needed!!
Shirish Sambad—Matheran case was solved by Amar Commission—Shirish had call of nature so he was not with us outside of suicide point.
Sunday, September 20, 2009
A look on existing food subsidy systen
August report submitted by expert group headed by Suresh tendulkar former chairman of the National Statistical Commission is a not in favour of those who has planned to make India developed by 2020. This report say that four out of ten in rural areas are poor and not capable to fulfill intake calorie criteria, a significant increase from the government previous estimate. 2004-5 government estimate pegged the rural poverty only 28.5%. It creates a deep concern among policy builder that whether our previous estimate was flawed or poverty being increased in recent year in spite of NAREGA like initiative by UPA government which it claimed a successful act in recent decades. The group, appointed by planning commission, expended the criteria which define the poverty line. New criteria include the education, health and actual spending on rent and conveyance as part of an individual’s consumption basket, besides expenditure on food. Our existing definition of poverty line .In India, since
1972, poverty is being calculated in terms of calories.2100 calories for Urban and 2400 calories for rural areas are the yardsticks to measure poverty in India. Another report published in 2007 put a even more severe picture before us .This report was prepared by National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector, headed by Arjun Sengupta, said 77% of the population subsist at just Rs 12 per person per day, much below the prevailing minimum wage, which ranges between Rs 40 to Rs 150 a day across states.
A indictment of existing food subsidy system—
This time committee report which came yesterday set up by rural development ministry and headed by N.C Sexana figure out the similar conclusion, it say that if we measure the actual poverty of the country on the basis of calorie intake then more than half of our total population will enjoy the yellow ration card. It figure out that number of poor people in country are at least double the officially declared poor in India and recommended to enlarging the category to those who entitled to take cheaper food from government.
1972, poverty is being calculated in terms of calories.2100 calories for Urban and 2400 calories for rural areas are the yardsticks to measure poverty in India. Another report published in 2007 put a even more severe picture before us .This report was prepared by National Commission for Enterprises in the Unorganized Sector, headed by Arjun Sengupta, said 77% of the population subsist at just Rs 12 per person per day, much below the prevailing minimum wage, which ranges between Rs 40 to Rs 150 a day across states.
A indictment of existing food subsidy system—
This time committee report which came yesterday set up by rural development ministry and headed by N.C Sexana figure out the similar conclusion, it say that if we measure the actual poverty of the country on the basis of calorie intake then more than half of our total population will enjoy the yellow ration card. It figure out that number of poor people in country are at least double the officially declared poor in India and recommended to enlarging the category to those who entitled to take cheaper food from government.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)